Les forces ukrainiennes semblent se rapprocher de la ville orientale férocement disputée de Bakhmut, alors que le ministère russe de la Défense a déclaré que Kiev avait également lancé une nouvelle attaque majeure autour de Zaporizhzhia.
Dans l’ensemble, l’escalade des combats autour d’objectifs clés pour Kiev suggère que l’Ukraine pourrait entrer dans une nouvelle phase de sa contre-offensive, huit semaines après le début des opérations.
Dans le sud, le centre des efforts renouvelés était la ville d’Orikhiv et les villages voisins.
Igor Konashenkov, porte-parole du ministère russe de la Défense, a décrit une attaque “massive” mercredi et une seconde près de Robotyne, mais a déclaré qu’elles avaient été repoussées.
Cependant, le blogueur militaire russe Rybar a décrit une “attaque par plus de 80 véhicules blindés, dont des chars, des véhicules de combat d’infanterie, des véhicules blindés de transport de troupes et des véhicules de combat”, ajoutant que les forces ukrainiennes avaient réussi à pénétrer “dans trois zones… [au milieu] de féroces batailles”. .”
L’Ukraine a intensifié ses attaques ces derniers jours dans la région d’Orikhiv tout en poussant sa campagne vers l’est autour de Bakhmut, où il y a trois mois, la Russie a remporté la victoire dans une bataille sanglante de plusieurs mois pour la ville dévastée.
Ces derniers jours, les troupes ukrainiennes auraient pris le village d’Andriivka et avançaient autour du village de Klishchiivka, à environ six kilomètres au sud, occupant d’importantes hauteurs et forêts à proximité.
L’Ukraine tente un encerclement partiel de Bakhmut, poussant du nord et du sud pour menacer les forces russes à l’intérieur.
Un haut responsable ukrainien a déclaré que tous les systèmes d’armes disponibles étaient utilisés dans les batailles, y compris les armes à sous-munitions récemment fournies par les États-Unis.
L’Institut pour l’étude de la guerre, un groupe de réflexion basé à Washington, a décrit les gains ukrainiens revendiqués comme « tactiquement significatifs », et certains blogueurs militaires russes ont semblé confirmer les progrès de l’Ukraine.
L’avancée, si elle était confirmée, rapprocherait les forces ukrainiennes de l’importante autoroute T053, la route nord-sud qui traverse la ville.
“L’ennemi a réussi à occuper les hauteurs adjacentes [de Klishchiivka], d’où il a déployé des tirs de systèmes antichars et de groupes de tireurs d’élite pour soutenir l’infanterie et l’équipement qui progressaient”, a rapporté un blogueur militaire russe. “De violentes batailles se déroulent depuis plusieurs jours et les drones ennemis de reconnaissance et de frappe ont une influence importante sur l’évolution de la situation.”
Andriy Kovaliov, porte-parole de l’état-major des forces armées ukrainiennes, a déclaré que les troupes avaient avancé en direction du village de Staromayorske, dans la région de Donetsk, près des colonies reprises par l’Ukraine le mois dernier.
Les troupes ukrainiennes renforçaient les positions qu’elles avaient prises et les forces russes montaient une forte résistance, a-t-il dit.
Autour d’Andriivka, qui avait été utilisée comme plaque tournante logistique par les forces russes, la Russie a déployé des chars et des véhicules blindés pour tenter de dégager la limite forestière des forces ukrainiennes, mais apparemment sans soutien d’infanterie suffisant, entraînant des pertes importantes de véhicules ciblés par des drones. Il y avait des revendications d’un retrait russe de la colonie.
La poursuite des combats pour Bakhmut, où il y a eu des combats continus depuis le début de l’été dernier, a souligné la fragile emprise de la Russie sur la ville et la campagne environnante depuis qu’elle est apparue comme un objectif alors que son avance vers les villes orientales de Sloviansk et Kramatorsk a faibli.
Lançant un grand nombre de troupes dans les combats, menés par les forces des paramilitaires privés de Wagner, Moscou a revendiqué une tentative de victoire en mai après avoir subi de lourdes pertes dans les efforts pour prendre Bakhmut, les responsables ukrainiens affirmant que leurs tactiques de défense avaient été conçues pour épuiser les forces russes. les forces.
La Russie a intensifié ses attaques plus au nord dans la région de Kreminna et Lyman, ce qui, selon les analystes, pourrait être conçu pour soulager la pression vers le sud en attirant des troupes dans ce secteur.
Depuis que Kiev a lancé sa contre-offensive à travers le pays cet été, les responsables ont insisté sur le fait qu’ils avançaient prudemment afin de limiter les pertes ukrainiennes. La vice-ministre de la Défense, Hanna Malyar, a affirmé plus tôt cette semaine que les forces russes subissaient des pertes à un rythme nettement plus élevé dans les batailles orientales. Cela peut s’expliquer par l’utilisation massive d’armes à sous-munitions fournies par les États-Unis lors des récents combats, alors que la Russie tentait initialement d’avancer des réserves.
Le rythme auparavant lent des gains de l’Ukraine huit semaines après le début de sa contre-offensive a suscité un certain scepticisme quant à la capacité de Kiev à réaliser une percée alors qu’elle a affronté les défenses bien préparées de la Russie, y compris des champs de mines barrières de 10 milles de profondeur par endroits.
Depuis la décision de Washington d’accepter de fournir à l’Ukraine des armes à sous-munitions – bien qu’elles soient interdites par la majorité des pays – l’Ukraine a commencé à utiliser ces armes plus massivement contre les positions défensives de la Russie.
Reading this prompted me to clean up some old notes related to the topic, and a stop at progressmapping extended that organising urge, content that triggers personal organisation rather than just consuming attention is content with motivating energy and this site has the kind of clarity that prompts active follow up rather than passive consumption.
Found the section structure particularly thoughtful, and a stop at luxuryseconds suggested the same care across the broader site, structural choices guide the reader through the material in ways most people do not consciously notice but feel the absence of when those choices are made carelessly or not at all.
Reading this prompted a small redirection in something I was working on, and a stop at knowledgebaypro extended that redirecting influence, content that affects my actual work rather than just my thinking has the highest practical impact and this site is providing that level of influence for me at a sustainable rate apparently.
Stands apart from similar pages by actually being useful, that is high praise these days, and a look at visualharbor kept that standard going, you can tell when a site is built around the reader versus around metrics and this one clearly belongs to the first category for sure based on what I read.
Reading this slowly in the morning before opening email, and a stop at actionpathway extended that protected attention, content that earns the prime morning reading slot before the daily distractions begin is content with elevated status and this site has earned that prime slot consistently in my recent reading habits clearly.
Vague feelings of recognition kept surfacing as I read because the writing names things I have been thinking, and a look at facthorizon produced more of those recognition moments, content that gives shape to private intuitions is content that makes me feel less alone in my own thinking and this site has that effect.
Just want to acknowledge that the writing here is doing something right, and a quick visit to momentumdesign confirmed the same standards run across the broader site, recognising good work is something I try to do when I find it because the alternative is silence and silence rewards mediocrity.
Now appreciating that the post did not require me to agree with the writer to find it valuable, and a look at clarityoveractivity maintained the same useful regardless of agreement quality, content that informs even when it does not convince is content with broader utility and this site reads as useful even when I disagree.
Thanks for the breakdown, it gave me a clearer picture of something I had been confused about for a while now, and a stop at executeplansnow closed the remaining gaps in my understanding nicely, no need to hunt around twenty other articles to put the pieces together which is a real time saver.
A piece that brought a sense of order to a topic I had been finding chaotic, and a look at moveideasforwardclean continued that organising effect, content that imposes useful structure on messy subjects is doing genuine intellectual work and this site is providing that organisational function across multiple posts I have read recently here.
Decided to read more before commenting and the more I read the more I wanted to say something, and a stop at clarityturnsideas pushed that impulse further, when content provokes the urge to participate rather than just consume it is doing something quite specific and worth recognising clearly when it happens during reading.
Well done, the kind of post that makes you slow down and actually read instead of skimming for keywords, and a look at momentumbychoice kept me reading carefully too, that is a sign of writing that has been crafted rather than churned out for an algorithm to see today and tomorrow.
Will be passing this along to a few people who would benefit from the perspective shared here, and a stop at nexustower only added to what I will be sharing, this kind of generous content deserves to circulate widely rather than getting buried in some search engine algorithm tweak that pushes it down the rankings.
Felt like I was reading something written by someone who actually thinks about the topic rather than reciting it, and a look at directionbuildsvelocity reinforced that impression, the difference between recited content and considered content is huge and this site clearly belongs to the latter category which I appreciate as a careful reader looking for substance.
Now thinking about whether the writer might publish a longer form work I would buy, and a look at buildcleartraction suggested the same depth would translate, content that makes me want to pay for related work in other formats is content that has earned commercial trust as well as attention trust and this site has both clearly.
Thanks for the honest framing without exaggerated claims that the topic will change my life, and a stop at momentumfactory kept the same modest tone, restraint in marketing language signals trustworthiness and the writers here are clearly playing the long game by building credibility rather than chasing immediate clicks through hyperbole.
If I had to defend the time I spend reading independent blogs this site would feature in the defence, and a look at motionbeatsmotionless reinforced that defensive utility, the ongoing case for non algorithmic reading is one I make to myself periodically and sites like this one provide the actual evidence that supports the case clearly.
Now realising this site has been quietly doing good work for longer than I knew, and a look at directionbuildsvelocity suggested an archive worth exploring, sites with deep archives of consistent quality represent a different kind of resource than sites with viral hits and this one looks like the durable kind based on what I see.
Liked that the post landed without needing to manufacture controversy or take a contrarian stance for attention, and a stop at clarityactivatesmotion continued that grounded approach, content that earns attention through quality rather than provocation is the kind that builds long term trust rather than burning it on quick wins.
Felt like the writer was speaking directly to someone with my level of curiosity, neither talking down nor showing off, and a stop at forwardmovementengine kept that comfortable matching going, finding writing that meets you where you are rather than asking you to climb up or stoop down feels great every time it happens.
Decided to set aside time later to read more carefully, and a stop at ideaprogression reinforced that decision, content that earns a calendar entry rather than just a passing read is in a different tier altogether and this site is clearly working at that elevated level which I really do appreciate as a reader today.
Probably one of the more reliable sources I have found for this kind of careful coverage, and a look at focustrajectory reinforced the reliability, the small group of sources I would describe as reliable for a given topic is curated carefully and this site has earned a place in that small group through consistent performance.
Felt slightly impressed without being able to point to one specific reason, and a look at focusdrivesexecution continued that diffuse positive feeling, when content works at a level you cannot easily articulate the writer is doing something with craft rather than just delivering information and that is something I have learned to recognise.
Now noticing the careful balance the post struck between confidence and humility, and a stop at actiondrive maintained the same balance, finding the line between asserting and admitting is hard and this site has clearly developed the calibration to walk that line consistently which produces a more persuasive reading experience for me.
Came away with a small but real shift in perspective on the topic, and a stop at buildmomentumclean pushed that shift a bit further, the kind of subtle reframing that good writing does to a reader without making a big deal of it is something I always appreciate when it happens which is sadly not that often.
A piece that handled the topic with appropriate weight without becoming portentous, and a look at actionwithstructure continued that calibrated seriousness, content that takes itself seriously without becoming pompous is something this site has clearly figured out and the balance shows up in every piece I have read across multiple sessions now.
Reading this gave me material for a conversation I needed to have anyway, and a stop at ideasneedalignment added even more talking points, content that connects to upcoming social or professional needs rather than just being interesting in the abstract is the kind that earns priority placement in my attention these days routinely.
Quality you can feel from the first paragraph, the writer clearly knows the topic and how to share it, and a quick look at directionunlocked confirmed the same depth runs throughout the rest of the site as well which is rare and worth pointing out when it happens online for any reader passing through.
Picked up a couple of new ideas here that I can actually try out, and after my visit to forwardintentions I have even more notes saved, this is the kind of resource that pays you back for the time you spend on it which is rare to come across in this corner of the web.
Decided this was the best thing I had read all morning, and a stop at growthadvancescleanly kept that ranking intact, ranking my reading is something I do mentally throughout the day and the top rank is competitive and not easily won but this site won it without needing to overstate its claims for that.
A piece that did exactly what it promised in the headline without overshooting or underdelivering, and a look at actionturnsvision continued that calibration, alignment between promise and delivery is a basic editorial virtue that many sites fail at and this site has clearly mastered the matching of expectation and substance throughout pieces.
Stands out for actually being useful instead of just being long, and a look at focusdefinesdirection kept that going, length without value is the default mode of most blogs these days but this site has clearly chosen a different path which I respect a lot as a reader who values careful editing decisions like that.
Found this via a link from another piece I was reading and the click was worth it, and a stop at jalaxis extended the value across more material, the open web still rewards clicking through citations when the underlying writers care about each other work and this site clearly belongs to that network.
Speaking from the perspective of having read widely on the topic this site offers something distinct, and a look at buildclearoutcomes reinforced that distinctness, the rare site that contributes something genuinely original to a saturated topic is the rare site worth following carefully and this one has demonstrated that original contribution capability today.
Worth saying that the writing carries a particular kind of authority without making any explicit claims to it, and a stop at websupreme extended that earned authority feeling, sites that demonstrate expertise through the quality of their explanations rather than by stating credentials are sites I trust most and this site has it.